Grimwood, Tom
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8099-6191
(2025)
What is an Artifice? The precarities of Culbertson’s two distinctions on generative AI.
Journal of Applied Hermeneutics
.
Item availability may be restricted.
![]() |
PDF
- Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (208kB) | Contact the author |
Abstract
Culbertson's recent paper within the Journal of Applied Hermeneutics offered two distinctions at work in the reading and understanding of Natural Learning Processing. This paper was a signigicant articulation of a general hermeneutic response to the prospect of generative AI and its challenges for interpretation. But it also raised some nagging questions on whether there is a risk that we settle too quickly on the promotion of close reading and the aspirations of “thinking with others” in dialogical open-ness, and in doing so also settle a little too quickly on what the object of the hermeneutic encounter is, at the expense of other possible dialogues, or traditions, at work? This paper argues that a dimension at work in the debate over generative AI often missed from hermeneutic discussions is that of the artifice. It the dimension of the artifice, as an interpretative element of the “artificial” at work in AI; not as a critique of Culbertson’s two distinctions, but rather to suggest a certain precarity to their resoluteness, a precarity which further research would benefit from.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Journal / Publication Title: | Journal of Applied Hermeneutics |
Publisher: | Canadian Hermeneutic Institute |
ISSN: | 1927-4416 |
Departments: | Institute of Health > Psychology and Psychological Therapies Health and Society Knowledge Exchange (HASKE) |
Depositing User: | Tom Grimwood |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jul 2025 09:11 |
Last Modified: | 18 Jul 2025 09:15 |
URI: | https://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/8969 |