The perception of biopsychosocial impacts of COVID-19 during lockdown restrictions over time in the UK – a mixed methods study

Grimwood, Sam, Stuart, Kaz ORCID logo ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-5779 , Browning, Ruth, Bidmead, Elaine ORCID logo ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0166-4506 and Winn-Read, Thea (2021) The perception of biopsychosocial impacts of COVID-19 during lockdown restrictions over time in the UK – a mixed methods study. Journal of Ideas in Health, 4 (2). pp. 402-414.

[thumbnail of Stuart_ThePerceptionOf.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License CC BY

Download (543kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.47108/jidhealth.Vol4.IssSpecial...

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted the health of individuals physically, mentally, and socially. This study aims to gain a deeper understanding of this impact across the pandemic from a biopsychosocial stance.

Methods: A survey created by the research team was employed between November 2020 and February 2021 across social media, relevant organizations, and networks. The survey incorporated 5-time points across the different stages of the pandemic, covering biological, psychological, and social. There were 5 items for each survey (Very Positive affect to Very Negative affect), and analysis was undertaken using SPSS version 16. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric Friedman and Wilcoxon Tests, as well as correlations between the three domains, were implemented.

Results: This study included 164 participants (77.0% female and 35.0% male) across 24 out of 38 counties in the UK. The impact of COVID-19 on biological domain was significant across the five data points χ2(4) = 63.99, p < 0.001, psychological χ2(4) = 118.939, p <0.001 and socially χ2(4) = 186.43, p <0.001. Between the 5 data points, 4 out of 5 had a negative impact, however between the first stage of lockdown and the easing of restrictions, findings for biological (Z=-2.35, p <0.05), psychological (Z=-6.61, p < 0.001), and socially (Z = -8.61, p <0.001) were positive. Negative correlations between the three domains across the pandemic are apparent, but in later stages, the biological domain had a positive correlation r = 0.52, p < 0.001.

Conclusion: The data shows a negative impact from the self-reported perception of wellbeing from a biopsychosocial stance over time, as well as perceiving the three domains to interact negatively. To address these biopsychosocial issues, the research implies a place-based integrated recovery effort is needed, addressing biological, psychological, and social issues simultaneously. Further research should investigate biopsychosocial health among a more generalizable population.

Item Type: Article
Journal / Publication Title: Journal of Ideas in Health
Publisher: JIH
ISSN: 2645-9248
Departments: Centre for Research in Health and Society (CRIHS)
Institute of Health > Social Work, Children and Families
Additional Information: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Depositing User: Kaz Stuart
Date Deposited: 03 Sep 2021 12:23
Last Modified: 15 Feb 2024 12:19
URI: https://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/6192

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year



Downloads each year

Edit Item