Evidencing atmospheres and narratives: measuring the immeasurable?

Prince, Heather ORCID logo ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6199-4892 and Hayes, Tracy ORCID logo ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6330-6520 (2017) Evidencing atmospheres and narratives: measuring the immeasurable? In: European Institute for Outdoor Adventure Education and Experiential Learning (EOE) International Seminar, 28 June - 2 July 2017, University of St Mark and St John, Plymouth, UK.

[thumbnail of Evidencing Atmospheres and Narratives HP and TH June 2017.pdf]
PDF - Presentation
Available under License CC BY-NC

Download (763kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Prince_EvidencingAtmospheres.pdf]
PDF - Supplemental Material
Available under License CC BY-NC

Download (69kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.marjon.ac.uk/courses/our-faculties/fac...


As outdoor educators and researchers, we face many challenges. Not least of which is the need to evidence the impact of our work. How do we do this with something as ephemeral and tenuous as Hauntings or Aesthetics or Atmospheres – what about when we sense a presence that is not physically present?(i) Can we really claim that narratives and storytelling are valid forms of research? What about being robust?(ii) Whilst we welcome initiatives that highlight the importance of spending time outdoors, and seek to nurture young people’s connection with nature, we believe that many research projects are attempting to measure the immeasurable.(iii) It is one thing to co-construct a way of thinking about our outdoor practice so that new understandings of atmospheres and narratives engender curiosity, raise cultural sensitivity and enrich our outdoor practices. It is a very different thing to show how this is achieved. Given the increasing importance of ‘impact’ in relation to both academia and practice, we ask a number of questions, including: a) What does impact really mean, and who is ‘impacted’? b) How do we want our research to be used, and who do we want to read/act on it? We will explore the apparent need to measure, quantify and statistically signify concepts that are arguably better suited to interpretative practices. We will discuss the contentious nature of the word ‘impact’ and propose that ‘influence’ is preferable for concepts that change with each situation, individual and environment. Is this type of work truly measurable?

(i) Loynes, C. (2015) Email to Tracy Hayes, 27 March.
(ii) Bragg, R.; Wood, C.; Barton, J. and Pretty, J. (2013) Measuring connection to nature in children aged 8 -12: A robust methodology for the RSPB. Essex: Essex Sustainability Institute and University of Essex.
(iii) Chia, J. Measuring the immeasurable? Diss. Bond University, 2006. Available from:
http://www.pria.com.au/sitebuilder/resources/knowledge/asset/files/2/measuringtheimmeasurablejoychia.pdf Last Accessed: 17/01/2017.
Goleman, D., ed. (2008) Measuring the Immeasurable: The Scientific Case for Spirituality. Boulder, USA: Sounds True Inc.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Workshop)
Departments: Academic Departments > Science, Natural Resources & Outdoor Studies (SNROS) > Outdoor Studies
Additional Information: See also the published abstract here: http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/4095/
Depositing User: Heather Prince
Date Deposited: 17 Jul 2017 14:46
Last Modified: 12 Jan 2024 17:45
URI: https://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/3103


Downloads per month over past year

Downloads each year

Edit Item