Surprisingly poor correlation among pain scores prior to total hip arthroplasty

Ions, Keith and Jonker, Leon ORCID logo ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-4663 (2010) Surprisingly poor correlation among pain scores prior to total hip arthroplasty. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 20 (8). pp. 619-621.

[thumbnail of Word Document] Other (Word Document) - Accepted Version
Available under License CC BY-NC

Download (25kB)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-010-0632-6

Abstract

Pain is the main indication for total hip arthroplasty but is a subjective experience and can therefore be difficult to assess. Using completed forms from six hundred consecutive patients who were to undergo a total hip arthroplasty, we investigated the level of correlation between three widely used pain rating scales. These are: visual analogue pain scale, Merle d’Aubigne pain score and the first question on the Oxford Hip Score. We demonstrate here that there is a surprisingly poor correlation between the scores obtained from the three rating scales, albeit statistically significant. The use of more than one of the above pain scores is indicated due to the slightly different ways in which they ask the patients about their pain experience. This undoubtedly contributes to the modest correlation levels observed. Drawing extensive conclusions from a single pain rating scale may have significant clinical implications.

Item Type: Article
Journal / Publication Title: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Publisher: Springer Verlag (Germany)
ISSN: 1432-1068
Departments: Academic Departments > Health, Psychology & Social Studies (HPSS)
Depositing User: Insight Administrator
Date Deposited: 17 Jul 2014 14:52
Last Modified: 12 Jan 2024 09:45
URI: https://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/1574

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year



Downloads each year

Edit Item