An evaluation of the implementation of a “No Force First” informed organisational guide to reduce physical restraint in mental health and learning disability inpatient settings in the UK

Haines-Delmont, Alina, Goodall, Katie, Duxbury, Joy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1772-6874 and Tsang, Anthony (2022) An evaluation of the implementation of a “No Force First” informed organisational guide to reduce physical restraint in mental health and learning disability inpatient settings in the UK. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13 .

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License CC BY Download (283kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: The use of physical restraint on vulnerable people with learning disabilities and mental health problems is one of the most controversial and criticised forms of restrictive practice. This paper reports on the implementation of an organisational approach called “No Force First” within a large mental health organisation in England, UK. The aim was to investigate changes in violence/aggression, harm, and physical restraint following implementation.

Methods: The study used a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design. Recorded incidents of violence/aggression from 44 inpatient mental health and learning disabilities (including forensic) wards were included ( n = 13,599). Two study groups were created for comparison: the “intervention” group comprising all incidents on these wards during the 24 months post-implementation (2018–2019) ( n = 6,551) and the “control” group comprising all incidents in the 24 months preceding implementation (2015–2016) ( n = 7,048). Incidents recorded during implementation (i.e., 2017) were excluded ( n = 3,705). Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Multivariate regression models using generalised estimating equations were performed to estimate unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) of physical restraint and harm, using type of wards, incident, and violence/aggression as key covariates.

Results: A significant 17% reduction in incidence of physical restraint was observed [IRR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.77–0.88, p < 0.0001]. Significant reductions in rates of harm sustained and aggression/violence were also observed, but not concerning the use of medication during restraint. The prevalence of physical restraint was significantly higher in inpatients on forensic learning disability wards than those on forensic mental health wards both pre- (aPR = 4.26, 95% CI 2.91–6.23) and post-intervention (aPR = 9.09, 95% CI 5.09–16.23), when controlling for type of incident and type of violence/aggression. Physical assault was a significantly more prevalent risk factor of restraint use than other forms of violence/aggression, especially that directed to staff (not to other patients).

Conclusions: This is a key study reporting the positive impact that organisational models and guides such as “No Force First” can have on equipping staff to focus more on primary and secondary prevention as opposed to tertiary coercive practices such as restraint in mental health and learning disabilities settings.

Item Type:	Article
Journal / Publication Title:	Frontiers in Psychiatry
Publisher:	Frontiers Media
ISSN:	1664-0640
Departments:	Institute of Health > Nursing
Additional Information:	Joy Duxbury, Professor of Mental Health and Director of Research for the Institute of Health at the University of Cumbria, UK. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice.
Depositing User:	Joy Duxbury
Date Deposited:	07 Oct 2024 09:16
Last Modified:	07 Oct 2024 09:30
URI:	https://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/8436

Downloads