Waring, Lorelei, Bolton, Gareth ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-4257 , Smart, Shelley, Sloane, Charles ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5343-7626 and Miller, Paul K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5611-1354 (2019) A two-year evaluation of a direct-entry postgraduate ultrasound programme: mapping the student experience. In: United Kingdom Imaging and Oncology Congress (UKIO), 10-12 June 2019, ACC, Liverpool. (Unpublished)
Preview |
PDF (author abstract)
- Supplemental Material
Available under License CC BY-NC Download (76kB) | Preview |
Preview |
PDF (published abstract)
- Supplemental Material
Available under License CC BY-NC Download (297kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: A progressive shortage of qualified clinicians within the UK’s public ultrasound departments has been documented for some time (Migration Advisory Committee, 2013), as have the organisational, physical and psychological consequences for departmental managers and working sonographers themselves (Miller et al., 2018; Waring et al., 2018; Bolton and Cox, 2015). Extant strategies to enhance recruitment from traditional graduate cohorts (typically diagnostic radiography) have, to date, barely kept pace with wastage. Consequently, new direct-entry programmes have been necessitated (Society and College of Radiographers, 2013). This presentation reports findings from an evaluation of one of the UK’s first postgraduate direct entry programmes, with a particular focus on student experience within the first cohort.
Methods: A thematic analysis informed by a Straussian model of Grounded Theory was employed (Sloane and Miller, 2017); semi-structured interviews with N=5 participating students with a variety of graduate backgrounds were conducted at the end of the first and the second year of the programme.
Results: Five Global themes emerged: (a) The perceived and real benefits of prior undergraduate anatomical/biological education; (b) The perceived and real benefits of prior clinical experience in any field; (c) The demands of a placement-oriented programme and the importance of a clinical coordinator; (d) Balancing academic achievement with clinical objectives, and; (e) Concerns regarding HCPC registration.
Conclusions: It was clear that many of the academic and practical worries articulated by participating students at the end of their first year had evaporated by the end of the second. Equally, adaptations were rapidly made to the demands of placement work where it was a new experience. Managing clinical objectives and lack of HCPC registration, however, remained concerns to the end.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Poster) |
---|---|
Departments: | Institute of Health > Medical Sciences Social Issues in Medical Imaging (SIMI) |
Additional Information: | Poster P231. |
Depositing User: | Paul Miller |
Date Deposited: | 24 Jan 2019 12:13 |
Last Modified: | 13 Jan 2024 08:16 |
URI: | https://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/4402 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Downloads each year