Austen, Liz (2016) Balancing academic gatekeeping and interpersonal positioning: a qualitative analysis of written feedback to undergraduate students. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 10 (2). pp. 67-81.
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License CC BY-NC Download (516kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article will discuss the findings from a qualitative analysis of 136 pieces of written feedback on summative student assessments. The assessment and feedback mechanisms vary in format, and the sample covered all three levels of an undergraduate programme (four courses) in one case department. This article will evidence linguistic variations in written feedback which signify an unequal discursive relationship between the marker and student. This variation is likely to contribute to issues in feedback clarity and consistency. Tensions amid the language used reflect academic gatekeeping, and the interpersonal aspect of feedback, will be discussed with reference to notions of 'linguistic capital'. Assisting students in the interpretation of written feedback, and encouraging alternative forms of feedback to enhance staff-student dialogue will be suggested as recommendations.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Journal / Publication Title: | Practitioner Research in Higher Education |
Publisher: | University of Cumbria |
ISSN: | 1755-1382 |
Departments: | Academic Departments > Institute of Education (IOE) > Initial Teacher Education (ITE) |
Depositing User: | Anna Lupton |
Date Deposited: | 28 Feb 2017 11:01 |
Last Modified: | 12 Jan 2024 16:32 |
URI: | https://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/2707 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Downloads each year