Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources

Bloxham, Susan (2009) Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (2). pp. 209-220. Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL:


This article challenges a number of assumptions underlying marking of student work in British universities. It argues that, in developing rigorous moderation procedures, we have created a huge burden for markers which adds little to accuracy and reliability but creates additional work for staff, constrains assessment choices and slows down feedback to students. In this under-researched area of higher education, the article will explore whether there are other ways to provide confidence in marking and grading. These might divert this energy into productive activities with useful outcomes for students and learning.

Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Publisher: Taylor and Francis (Routledge)
ISSN: Print ISSN: 0260-2938 ; Online ISSN: 1469-297X
Related URL(s):
Departments: Services > Academic Quality & Development > CDEPP
Depositing User: Insight Administrator
Date Deposited: 14 Oct 2010 11:29
Last Modified: 26 Aug 2016 16:08

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item