Mountains, cones and dilemmas of context: the case of "ordinary language" in philosophy and social scientific method

Miller, Paul K. and Grimwood, Tom (2015) Mountains, cones and dilemmas of context: the case of "ordinary language" in philosophy and social scientific method. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 45 (3). pp. 331-355.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Version
Download (373kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0048393115579668

Abstract

The order of influence from thesis to hypothesis, and from philosophy to the social sciences, has historically governed the way in which the abstraction and significance of language as an empirical object is determined. In this paper, an argument is made for the development of a more reflexive intellectual relationship between ordinary language philosophy (OLP) and the social sciences that it helped inspire. It is demonstrated that, and how, the social scientific traditions of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis press OLP to re-consider the variety of problematic abstractions it has previously made for the sake of philosophical clarity, thereby self-reinvigorating.

Item Type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Publisher: SAGE Publications
ISSN: 0048-3931
Departments: Faculty of Health and Science > Medical and Sports Sciences > Sports and Physical Activity > Sport
Faculty of Health and Science > Rehabilitation and Social Work > Social Work and Social Care
Depositing User: Paul Miller
Date Deposited: 09 Nov 2015 10:32
Last Modified: 20 May 2017 09:36
URI: http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/1809

Available Versions of this Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year



Downloads each year

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item